Random Walks

How much will I get paid?

2009-07-16T06:33:00.000-07:00

One question had bothered me quite a lot...

As a theoratical question: How can one decide how much people should get paid in different professions? What is the single most important element in the job profile?

This is assuming that pay in job market is not regulated, therefore it leaves all government jobs out of the consideration set.

Is it the demand supply?

Is it the hard-work that is required?

Is it the intelligence/IQ that is required?

Is it the utility of the profession to the community?

Is it the reputation of the profession?

Is it the breadth of work that you are to handle?

For me none of these qualities represent the answer. As a proud IIMB grad, I would have loved to say it depends!!! But that wouldn't me interesting!!!

My answer would be It is the uncertainity that you are required to handle in the Job!!!

Think bout it!!! I think it best correlates with the pay scale...

So, if you want to go up the ladder, stop running to your boss for every decision that you have to make... Learn to thrive in the chaos... One who makes the best decision in chaos is the one who will get paid the most!!!

Nothing but a story worth telling

2009-07-16T06:22:00.000-07:00

Here is my answer to THE question: Why am I living?

For the religious, the answer is : "So that I can do good deeds and attain Moksha"

For the naive , the answer is: "So that I can change the world and make it a better place to live"

For the genius, the answer is: "So that I can change the world and make it a better place to live"

For the stupid, the answer is: "What is this stupid question"

For the intelligent, the answer is: "I have been thinking about this, but I really do not have an answer"

For the lazy, the answer is: "Newton's first law!!! Living is the default thing, dying takes effort"

For me, the answer is: "To create a life, which is a story worth telling!!!"

As always, this is untill I change my mind!!!

An interesting day!!!

2008-12-07T07:38:00.000-08:00

Date: December 3rd
Time: 11 am
Venue: Narayanpet, Andhra Pradesh

I roamed around in a municipality called Narayanpet in Mahaboobnagar district of Andhra Pradesh for identifying feasible sites for developing Municipal Parks and Pay & Use Toilets. The town, which was the second biggest town of Andhra Pradesh after Hyderabad some forty years ago, has become one of the least developed municipalities due to negligence by politicians over the years. The town with around 70,000 population has few houses with toilets. Men, blatantly and women, with terrible sense of shame, attend to their natural calls publicly. There is no underground sewerage system in the town.

You always hear about how poor the rural India is!!! You know all the statistics and all the figures. Par woh tumhare Zahan (consciousness) pe asar nahi chhodta. Visiting these places has a very deep impact on one's consciousness. On one side, the selfishness in you shouts "Thank god I wasn't born here" and on the other side, the benevolence in you cries "Something ought to be done about this". After a few minutes the pessimist in you laments "There's hardly anything that I can do about this. I am too small a player in the big game." and the optimist in you responds that "These are the problems which attracted you to this field. Now you can't run away from them."

I bid an emotional farewell to the town.

Date: Same december 3rd.
Time: 6 pm
Venue: Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh

I had to make a presentation to secretary, Information Technology department, Government of India in Hyderabad International Convention Center. Since my boss was on a vacation, I was asked to make this presentation.

Everything about the occasion inspired a sense of awe in me. The truly international level of infrastructure, the tight security, amazingly well trained receptionists, lavish conference room, smooth leather seats, terribly impressive qualifications and designations and the wealth of experience of my audience, importance of the presentation, potential impact of issues that were to be discussed on IT industry in Hyderabad!!!

Ya, ya, I have written in another blog that I feel I am ready for the next challenge. But that is a comment on analytical ability. Here I had to call upon my experience. And if you know me, you know that there is nothing to call upon in that department, apart from a couple of years of trivial coding experience.

As always, I ended up wandering... What is more important? Is it developing public toilets in rural India or developing IT investment region in Andhra Pradesh? I was reminded of one of my courses in IIMB, Public economics, which talks about social welfare functions.

Let us suppose that there are n people in the society, n = 1,2,...,N, and let us denote the utility of nth Individual by Un. Let us simply say that society's welfare is some function W = f(U1 ,U2 ,..., Un) of the individual utilities. There are various possible forms that this function may take. The classic utilitarian form can be defined as the particular functional form W = SUM (U1, U2,.....Un). This effectively treats all people as equal - though it does assume that the utility values actually mean something.

The Rawlsian Utility function takes the form W = min( U1,U2,...,Un) - this is based on the argument that society's welfare should be based on the 'worst-off' member of society.

There is no right or wrong answer here. But everyone in policy making has to make a choice in what he thinks is the ideal utility function. The answer will determine your ideological choices. It will answer whether you are capitalist or a socialist. It will require you to answer whether you prefer to spend on industrial infrastructure or on irrigation.

Aaahhhhh!!! I hate choices!!!!
An interesting day nevertheless!!!

Experiences!!!

2008-12-01T11:31:00.000-08:00

I have been roaming in interior parts of AP for one of my projects these days. This is precisely the kind of experience I was looking for when I joined PwC GRID. It again reminded me of my project trip for study of NREGA scheme for Social Entrepreneurship project. I have been talking to various people about how life is in villages? How they spend their days and nights and what are their favourite childhood memories...

On a different note, the other day I was wondering... When I meet my batchmates in a 10 or 15 year reunion at IIMB, how will I decide who is the most successful of them all... Will it be who is the biggest newsmaker, or the one with the fanciest designation or heftiest pay package? Then I came to the conclusion, that I will feel that the person who has done what he really wanted to do in life... and probably contnues to have that freedom of doing what he wants to do everyday of his life. He doesn't have the pressure of running round the clock to meet the deadlines. He can take a day off without asking anyone etc... etc...

Coming back to the original point, life's very different in villages.
People say villagers are poor...
They don't have money...
They don't have knowledge...
They don't have economic freedom...

But they have time...
They have health...
They have sharp senses...
They have experiences...
They observe things...
They have stories to tell...
They have friends to die for...

Lives in cities are at best going to be a series of experiences none which will have enough impact on our consiousness to last the lifetime. For an experience to enter into our consiousness as a fond memory, it has to be either very high impact event like marriage or it has to be a repeatative phenomenon and you have to observe it carefully, giving it a lot of time and thought.
Village life gives you the opportunity to do the later.

So do I believe that they have better life in villages than what we have in cities?
No matter how much I think, I don't seem to be able to find answers to this question...

The answer lies in answering the question: What makes the life fullsome? Breadth of experience and thinking? or Depth of feeling and emotions...

Today my heart is leaning towards emotions, tomorrow it will prefer rationality.

One thing's for sure... I no longer pity the villagers and I no longer feel as fortunate...

Old Friends!!!

2008-11-27T23:05:00.000-08:00

Why do you always feel that the old times were better?
Even though in those very old times you felt the same!!!

Why do you feel that those old friends were dearer?
Even though your musings/outings were much the same!!!

Why do you feel that those old places were prettier?
Even though they were visited not by choice !!!

Why do you feel that those old games were merrier?
Even though it consisted of a throwing a few marbles here and there?

Why do you feel that those old festivals were grander?
Even though you spent hardly 1/100th of what you spend today!!!

What is the reason for this so called sense of Nostalgia???
Is it the present is uncertain while the past has frozen?
Or does it have it's root in some form of self pity for the present situation you are in!!!

Whatever it is!!!
I don't care!!!
Becasue I know!!!
That Tommorrow, all of today will become happier, dearer, merrier, prettier and grander!!!

Too big for my shoes????

2008-11-27T22:45:00.000-08:00

Is it because of the pride that has corrupted my soul even though I have been as vigilent as I can because of having gone to IIMB?
Or is it the the "so called Knowledge of Everything" that an MBA degree provides?

Or is it a function of my ego that was perceptible to even my kindergarden teacher?
Or is it called "Having the big dream" which is touted as a pre-requisite to doing big things in life?

Or is it that I am a man who likes to think that he should have answers to everything?
Or is it the desire to advise the world which stems from a nature that is a cocktail of noble intention and a belief that you are wiser than the others?

Or is it the curiosity of knowing the unknown whether it matters to you or not?
Or is it just that I like to mind others' business more than your own?

Whatever it is!!!!
I always think that
I am ready to take the next challenge!!!
Others think that
I am growing too big for my shoes!!!

An interesting two - by - two

2008-08-19T23:40:00.000-07:00

Lately, I have received two three mails from well - intentioned friends... That we must determine and spend some resources (time and money) for our country. They seem to be especially apalled at some statistics esp... relating to malnutrition, child mortality, manual scavanging, etc... But unfortunately the direction that they want to take seems to be very wrong... Here is a graphic that clarifies everything...

Mind it!!!!!!!

Solution to Oil price woes!!!!!!

2008-05-28T06:00:00.001-07:00

The reason for oil price rise in the world is two fold.
a) Supply side shocks: This includes political instability in oil rich countries like Nigeria, Iraq etc...
b) Demand side: This includes phenomenal increase in demand from countries like India and China and the rest of the developing world.

Problem with oil in India and China is that it is heavily subsidized. So what happens is users do not see the oil price as reflected in international markets and instead oil companies bear all losses which have to be financed finally by the government. This means that demand for oil is much higher than the what it should be at the price prevailing in international markets.

Now to suggest that Government of India should pass on the burden of oil entirely to the consumers is neither humane nor politically feasible. That government which does this is bound to loose the elections. But what can be done is have a differential price regime for different types of users of petrol and diesel. What I am proposing here will not only solve the problem of petrol price but also that of traffic to a large extent.

There are three types of passenger vehicles that use petrol.
a) Two wheelers
b) Four wheelers
c) Public Transport (Buses)

Now the government can have different prices for petrol which will ensure that considering the average no. of passengers these vehicle can carry and the average mileage of the vehicle, all these three end up with same value for petrol (in litres / person / kilo metre ).

so essentially what this means is that when you fill petrol in the bike you pay 25 Rs / Litre while if you fill it in car you pay 75 Rs / Litre.

This is an economically efficient scheme which will ensure prudent use of a scarce natural resource like petrol. The best part of this scheme is that it is going to be politically popular because majority of the voters travel via two wheelers in India and the car owners don't have the patience to stand in the line and vote in any case.

Very rarely you encounter a scheme which can solve a difficult problem in an economically efficient way which is also politically not catastrophic. The only problem that I forsee is development of black market for petrol for cars. But proper institutional and legal mechanism can be put in place which can ensure that corruption stays within acceptable limits. With differential price regime you can not eliminate corruption but if you can control it enough so that the overall objective of the whole scheme is satisfied than I think it's worth it.

Any troubled congress politician listening????????